Filter by year:

Major College Sports Spending up Nearly 11% Annually

The USA Today and Chronicle of Higher Education reported on a recently released study from the NCAA which states that major college athletic programs (in the Football Bowl Subdivision) increased their expenses 10.7% more per year between 2004 and 2007, from $31 million in 2004 to $42.2 million in 2007. The spending was more than

Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics Meeting Bios

John J. Cheslock, Associate Professor, Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Arizona Dr. John J. Cheslock is an Associate Professor in the Center for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Arizona. Receiving his Ph.D. in Labor Economics from Cornell University, Dr. Cheslock’s area of research focuses on the economics

NCAA Recognizes 767 Division I Sports Teams for Top Academic Performance

On April 22, the NCAA recognized 767 Division I sports teams for top academic performance as part of the NCAA’s academic reform program. The recognition awards are given each year to teams scoring in the top 10 percent in each sport according to their Academic Progress Rates (APR). The APR is a measure of a

Kentucky Athletics Should Give Back More to University

A column by Tom Eblen of the Lexington Herald-Leader proposed that the University of Kentucky (UK) athletic program contribute 10% of its budget, or $6.7 million this year, to other university purposes, rather than $1.2 million that it will pay. Eblen notes the historical financial picture of athletics and academics at UK, painted by a

Florida’s University Athletic Association to Make $6 Million in Cuts

According to the Gainsville Sun, The University of Florida (UF) has asked its University Athletic Association (UAA) to make $6 million is cuts, to be returned to the university’s budget. UF President Bernie Machen said, “They ought to take the same cut as everybody else.” The UAA’s budget reports show more than $80 million in

Commercialization of Men’s Basketball Players Without Adequate Compensation

Two articles recently published argue that the current situation where players are increasingly commercialized without receiving more financial benefits is no longer tenable. The Boston Globe argued that college athletes are not being compensated at an appropriate level in response to the earnings of the NCAA and higher education athletic departments. The article demonstrated that

Salary for University of Kentucky Men’s Basketball Coach Raises Questions of Academic Values

The Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription required) published an article which quoted NCAA officials as being critical of the escalating salaries of coaches at higher education’s most competitive athletic level, NCAA Division I. The University of Kentucky recently hired former University of Memphis basketball coach John Calipari with an eight-year, $32 million deal. “Eye-popping and

Graduation Rates of Black and White Athletes

Jason Whitlock of the Kansas City Star wrote an article that questioned the recently published data which highlighted the inequities of graduation rates of black and white basketball players at NCAA Division I institutions. Whitlock questioned whether the NCAA’s Academic Progress Rate and the recent graduation rates published by the The Institute for Diversity and

Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics Meeting Advisory

Knight Conference Center at the Newseum 555 Pennsylvania Ave. N. W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C. Follow the Knight Commission on Twitter: http://twitter.com/KnightAthletics Meeting Agenda and Session Summaries 10:00 – 11:00 a.m. Sports participation and sports sponsorship at Division I universities: How have participation and varsity sports opportunities changed over time? How have financial pressures contributed

AGB Issues Illustrative Policy on Athletics for College Governing Boards

The Association of Governing Boards (AGB) recently issued an update to its 2007 policy statement created to “reinvigorate efforts on the part of governing boards to align intercollegiate athletics with the mission, vision, and values of higher education.” As noted by Inside Higher Ed, the most significant difference with the new document is that the