Filter by year:

YAHOO!Sports: “While Congress and the NCAA squabble, NIL collectives lead push on revenue sharing”

Ross Dellenger covers the “chaos” that surrounds name, image, and likeness (NIL), after representatives of major collectives met in July with NCAA and SEC officials. Dellenger writes how collectives are poised to change college sports with a revenue-sharing model, and questions if legislation can provide any solutions or order. The article includes quotes Knight Commission

2023 NACDA Convention Presentation – “Projected Impact of New D-I Revenue in 2030 and Beyond”

The Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics presented FBS financial projections through 2032 from financial services firm CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen) based on an estimated $1.4 billion in additional annual revenue from the expanded CFP and “business-as-usual” spending patterns. The session also outlined financial solutions leaders should prioritize to fulfill the recently adopted NCAA holistic model and to

“The Projected Impact of New D-I Revenue in 2030 and Beyond”

The Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics presented FBS financial projections through 2032 from financial services firm CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen) based on an estimated $1.4 billion in additional annual revenue from the expanded CFP and “business-as-usual” spending patterns. The session also outlined financial solutions leaders should prioritize to fulfill the recently adopted NCAA holistic model and to

USC Annenberg Media: “The NCAA is broken. Meet the people trying to fix it.”

The panel discussion as part of the Future of College Athletics Summit held June 8, 2023, and hosted by the University of Arizona included the topics of governance, NIL, and reforms of those areas. The panel participants included NCAA president Charlie Baker and Knight Commission CEO Amy Perko. Read More Here.

On3.com: “The NCAA’s date on Capitol Hill was a big missed opportunity”

Eric Prisbell covered the U.S. House’s Innovation, Data and Commerce subcommittee hearing where, he writes, “for nearly three hours, several lawmakers made clear that they’re either misinformed or under-informed about the complexities of the fast-evolving college sports enterprise … And all parties departed with the NCAA not an inch closer to receiving the lifeline from

New York Times: “As Women’s Basketball Grows, Equity Is Trying to Catch Up”

Prior to the 2023 NCAA Women’s Final Four, Billy Witz examines the changes in the two years after a social media post of the inequities in the women’s basketball tournament went viral. From the article: Despite all the changes that have occurred since the Kaplan report, there’s been no change in revenue distribution,” said Amy

Sports Business Journal: “NCAA Revenue Rewards Only Men, Not Women”

Michael Smith examines the revenue distribution of the NCAA Tournament and March Madness “with close to $170 million distributed to conferences and schools after March Madness based on the performance of the teams in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament. No money is paid out based on how far the teams advance in the women’s basketball tournament.” From

Opinion: College football has a unique opportunity to right itself

Sports Business Journal (SBJ) published an opinion by Knight Commission member Eric Barron on March 13, 2023, highlighting the changes leaders should make before new revenue from the College Football Playoff expansion hits budgets, noting revenue will “outstrip even the NCAA’s March Madness revenue, making the CFP the biggest pot of gold in college sports

Forbes: “As March Madness Begins, It’s Time for Women to Play for the Money”

Karen Weaver took a look at the progress on addressing the inequities in the financial commitment and management of NCAA Division I men’s and women’s basketball tournaments and examined the opportunities ahead. Reporting on the existing revenue distribution inequities where the NCAA rewards schools for the tournament success of men’s basketball teams and not the